This is more of a feature request rather than an issue.
Yes - TinyMapper seems to be much faster than AutoMapper. But the problem is that your complex mapping approach eliminates the need for using an object mapper. If I want to map objects containing collections I'd rather do a manual mapping method than creating a TypeConverter.
So, bottom line is that I want to map classes like these:
class Parent
{
public Parent()
{
Children = new List<Child>();
}
public string Name {get;set;}
public List<Child> Children {get;private set;}
}
class Child
{
public string Name {get;set;}
}
without using a TypeConverter.
This is more of a feature request rather than an issue.
Yes - TinyMapper seems to be much faster than AutoMapper. But the problem is that your complex mapping approach eliminates the need for using an object mapper. If I want to map objects containing collections I'd rather do a manual mapping method than creating a
TypeConverter.So, bottom line is that I want to map classes like these:
without using a
TypeConverter.