Skip to content
Book demo

The Context Engine

Same frontier models.
More solved work per budget.

Augment's Context Engine maintains a live understanding of your stack across repos, services, and history, so agents spend fewer tokens searching and more turns shipping correct changes.

33%

Lower Spend

32%

Fewer Tokens

Opus 4.7

Same Model

001

Where AI coding costs get wasted

Most coding agents build context by grepping files, opening broad spans, and replaying everything they found into the model. They spend budget before they know what matters.

THE RESULT

Every miss becomes another tool call, another context replay, another correction, and another expensive turn.

COST DRIVERS IN LIMITED CONTEXT

Repeated cache reads
Irrelevant file spans
Extra search turns
Manual re-explanation
Context resets
More expensive retries

+Context Engine benchmark+

More solved engineering work per AI budget.

On the same frontier model, Auggie solved tasks at effectively the same rate as Claude Code while using materially fewer tokens. The difference is retrieval: the Context Engine sends the model the context that matters instead of replaying broad, noisy file searches.

Cost × pass rateSame five configurations · one plot
Terminal Bench 2.0x = cost · y = pass rate[ fig. 03 / scatter ]
Pass rate · higher is better ↑Percent of tasks the agent solved against the benchmark's official test harness. A couple points of variance is normal across runs.
$0$250$500$75060%65%70%75%80%BEST ↗Augment - GPT 5.4Augment - Gemini 3.1Augment - GPT 5.5Augment - Opus 4.7Claude Code - Opus 4.7
Cost (USD) · lower is better →Total dollars spent on the run at provider pricing. Sums input, output, and cache read/write tokens.
Token consumptionWhere the savings come from
SWE-Bench ProAugment vs Claude · Opus 4.7[ fig. 04 / tokens ]
Total tokensSum of input, output, cache read, and cache write tokens. The bill is computed from this.0.0%
Augment
1.65B
Claude
2.35B
Cache readsHistorical context replayed each turn. Most agents re-send the same candidate files every turn because they don't know which one matters; Augment's Context Engine sends only the slice the task touches.0.0%
Augment
1.58B
Claude
2.27B
Cache writesNew context tokens written to the cache so the next turn can read them back.0.0%
Augment
52.8M
Claude
63.8M
Saved per run$421.34Pass rate+1.9 pts

FULL CODE SEARCH

Real-time semantic retrieval

The Context Engine is not just grep or keyword matching. It is a full search engine for your code that retrieves the right slice before the model spends tokens exploring.

Augment semantically indexes and maps your code, understanding relationships between hundreds of thousands of files.

When you ask "add logging to payment requests," it maps the entire path: React app, Node API, payment service, database, and webhook handlers. The model sees what matters instead of paying for broad exploratory search.

paymentloggingobservabilityAPI requests
coverage4(40%)
matches1·3
saas-api/src
api/users.ts
api/payments.ts
94%keyword
api/subscriptions.ts
services/billing.service.ts
89%semantic
services/auth.service.ts
middleware/validator.ts
models/user.model.ts
utils/stripe-client.ts
91%semantic
lib/telemetry.ts
87%semantic
config/database.ts

Fig. 002Semantic search retrieval

The Context Engine retrieves with:

What's active vs. deprecated
How services connect and depend on each other
What you're actually working on right now in your IDE

Fewer misses across every source

Code is only part of the context agents need. Augment grounds retrieval in the artifacts that explain why the code works the way it does, so agents spend fewer turns rediscovering decisions your team already made.

REALTIME RAW CONTEXTCodeDependenciesDocumentationStyleRecent changesIssuesSEMANTIC UNDERSTANDINGCURATED CONTEXTCompletionsCode ReviewAgentsSpecs4,456 sources → 682 relevantFig. 1.1

Commit history

Why changes were made, reducing expensive archaeology

Codebase patterns

How your team actually builds, so agents reuse instead of reinvent

External sources

Docs, tickets, and design decisions that prevent dead-end searches

Tribal knowledge

Edge cases and conventions discovered through deep codebase analysis

INTELLIGENT CONTEXT CURATION

From millions of lines to the context that pays off

Less prompt weight. More task signal.

The Context Engine does not dump your entire codebase into the prompt. It:

  • Retrieves only what matters before the model spends tokens
  • Compresses context without losing critical information
  • Ranks and prioritizes based on task relevance
  • Respects access permissions with proof of possession

Result: Agents use fewer turns to find the change and fewer tokens to carry the work forward.

25%50%75%100%start new sessionSession Duration →Context Signal →
Augment
Other Tools

Activity

Fig. 003Context signal over session duration

COST AND THROUGHPUT

Better context compounds across the team

Sharper context lowers per-task model waste, then compounds into faster reviews, safer refactors, and more engineering work completed per budget.

0%

Lower benchmark spend

On Terminal Bench 2.0 with Opus 4.7, Auggie spent 33% less than Claude Code while solving tasks at effectively the same rate.

01
0%

Lower private repo spend

Internal evaluations on private repositories showed the same pattern: near-parity on solved tasks with 41% lower total spend.

02
0hrs

Saved monthly

A 200+ person team cut PR review time from 7 minutes to 3 minutes. Senior engineers see 35% higher velocity, spending less time reviewing.

03
0x

Faster refactoring

A 150+ person team completed their most complex workflow refactoring in one week. Originally estimated at 6 months, with full test coverage.

04

Get Started

Control AI coding spend without downgrading models

The Context Engine works with codebases of any size, from side projects to enterprise monorepos, so agents spend less time searching and more time completing the work.